Showing posts with label Inception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inception. Show all posts

Thursday, February 24, 2011

My Oscar predictions for 2011

[My apologies for the font irregularities.]

So it’s that time of the year again when the Academy of motion picture arts & sciences will be handing out the bald, golden, naked man with a staff (that probably came out wrong *wink*) to the best of the best in the year gone by. Well, judging by the nominations they seem to have gotten most of the stuff in the right place. But then again like always there are epic UFO sized blunders too.

So, I decided to throw my 5 rupees into the ring & make predictions as to who might win, who might upset & while I’m at it also hand out a few Oscars of my own to the underdogs :) (You are free to suggest what my version of the Oscars should be called in the comments section because I’m just too lazy to think of a cool/lousy name). So here goes…

(Of course I’m wasted & jobless but even then I don’t have the time to predict the winners from ALL the Oscar categories, so I have just listed the major ones)

1. BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE

Who will win :- Colin Firth for ‘the King’s Speech’. This smart Britisher is the frontrunner having already bagged a BAFTA, & a Golden Globe for his performance as the stuttering King George VI in a film that’s been giving film critics around the world intense orgasms (94% on Rotten Tomatoes!). He was being touted for a Best Actor Oscar even before the film released. Looking forward to Colin’s…um…speech.

Who might upset:- Jesse Eisenberg for ‘The Social Network’. Although the chances of this happening are 1567894 : 1 you never know when the Academy springs up an unpleasant surprise. Eisenberg scores points for playing the fidgety facebook founder to perfection, making geekiness cool & making Zuckerberg who is already a pop culture icon, into an even bigger pop culture icon.

Who I give it to:- James Franco for ‘127 hours’. The movie would have fallen flat on its face if it wasn’t for Franco’s spirited performance. Despite just being a guy trapped by a boulder in a canyon Franco shows a terrific range throughout.

2. BEST ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Who will win:- Natalie Portman for ‘The Black Swan’. The pretty young (& heavily pregnant) actress is almost certain to bag her 2nd Oscar for portraying the Ballet dancer Nina in Aronofsky’s thriller. I just hope she doesn’t deliver a baby on stage while accepting her award.

Who might upset:- Annette Benning for ‘The Kids are alright’. The Oscars love to award actors who portray homosexuals, and Benning’s performance has been much loved & lauded in this tale of 2 lesbians who are out to seek the biological father of their teenage children.

Who I give it to:- Nicole Kidman for ‘Rabbit Hole’. Throughout most of the film it’s Kidman’s eyes & body language that do the talking & deliver the pain of a young mother who has lost a child. It’s a restrained performance, one of Kidman’s best in her entire career & this underrated actress should actually get her due.

Blunder:- No Julianne Moore for ‘The Kids are alright’. *throws tomato at the frailest looking academy member*

3. BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (MALE)

Who will win:- Christian Bale for ‘The Fighter’. The actor who is looking rather Jesus Christ-y nowadays what with the long hair & the beard etc. will most probably score a win on the night for the gritty portrayal of the once promising & later drug addict boxer Dicky Ecklund.

Who might upset:- Geoffery Rush for ‘The King’s Speech’. Rush, who plays a speech therapist to the King in the film, is an acting veteran, someone who has been at it for years & the academy might just tilt this into Rush’s favour as they often give an upper hand to experienced cadres.

Who I give it to:- Jeremy Renner for ‘The Town’. Renner was a powerhouse in Affleck’s heist movie with his aggression really coming forth. It was Jem's uneasiness & rebellion that kept the tension in the film alive.

Blunder:- Andrew Garfield not nominated for his portrayal of Eduardo Saverin in ‘The Social Network’. Boo!

4. BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE (FEMALE)

Who will win:- Mellisa Leo for ‘The Fighter’. 'The Fighter' basically sails through on the basis of its acting performances so it's not surprising that it gets nominations in all 4 acting categories. Mellisa Leo is the favourite to win here for playing the chain smoking, brash mother cum manager of Dicky Ecklund & Micky Ward.

Who might upset:- Helena Bonham Carter for ‘The King’s Speech’. Carter who plays queen to Firth’s King George has surprisingly not scored any major win this season despite the film being a darling at most award ceremonies & her performance being lauded. But, for some reason I get the feeling that her performance might charm the pants of the Oscar jury. Plus she’s really hot in a weird kinda way. Just saying.

Who I give it to:- Hailee Steinfeild for ‘True Grit’. Because it would be a lot fun to see a kid to shove dirt in the faces of such stalwarts & well, a Coen brothers film HAS to win something at the Oscars.

5. BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

Who will win:- Aaron Sorkin for ‘The Social Network’. Aaron Sorkin deserves as much credit for the success of TSN as director David Fincher. Adapted from the book ‘The accidental billionaires’ by Ben Mezrich, Sorkin, served up a screenplay that was racy, energetic & terrific. Employing a non-linear pattern & keeping the story tight almost making it unfold like a thriller. Well, no complaints here. The man deserves it if he wins.

Who might upset:- Simon Boufay for ‘127 hours’. By no means an easy story to make into a movie, Danny Boyle’s long time collaborator Boufay once again spun his web post ‘Slumdog’ & wrote an excellent screenplay that takes us on a rollercoaster ride. Although even here the chances of an upset are very very less.

Who I give it to:- I’d also give it to Aaron Sorkin :) simply put, there was no one better than him this year.

6. BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Who will win:- ‘The King’s speech’. Yet to see the film so can’t really elaborate on how good the screenplay is, but considering the amount of praise the film has garnered it’s bound to be one of a kind. One more jewel in the King’s crown (Am I going overboard with the royal puns?)

Who might upset:- ‘Inception’. Christopher Nolan being the genius that he is served us with a legendary screenplay that turned the viewer into a participant. The meticulous mind-bender won a hell of a lot of acclaim apart from being a box office bonanza & Nolan might just clinch this one. Too bad this is the only category he has been nominated for. Fingers crossed.

Who I give it to:- ‘The Kids are alright’. It would be really nice to see a moderate budget-indie flick to walk away with such a major award, because the chances of ‘kids’ winning any award apart from the acting categories are slim.

7. BEST DIRECTOR

Remember that epic UFO sized blunder I talked about up there? Well that was actually a gross understatement, because the blunder done in this category is way beyond. If a UFO was crossed with Noah’s ark & the result was then crossed over with a Tyrannosaurus Rex, then we'd roughly have an idea of the size of the blunder.

I mean no Christopher Nolan? WHAT THE F***K?

The man who directed a film that pushed the boundaries & brought about this avalanche all through the online forums/ social networks gets snubbed? SHAME!

As a Chris Nolan loyalist I boycott this category this year. I don’t care who wins but most probably it’ll be David Fincher. Sorry Academy, but screw you. You’ve committed the biggest Oscar blunder since 1990 when you gave ‘Dances with the wolves’ best Picture instead of ‘Goodfellas’. Had Nolan been nominated it would’ve been a really close fight, but the fact that he wasn’t clearly makes him the winner.

8. BEST ORIGINAL SCORE

Who will win:- Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross for ‘The Social Network’. The dynamic duo literally pump life into the movie with their eclectic mix of electronica & industrial rock tunes. A very different & ‘avant garde’ soundtrack but mind blowing none the less.

Who might upset:- Alexandre Desplat for ‘The King’s Speech’. Desplat is an upcoming French composer whose works have been very impressive. Apart from ‘King’ he also displayed his ahem…wizardry for ‘Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows pt. 1’ this year & will be returning for Pt.2. And surprise surprise, the man also scored for ‘Twilight: New Moon’ becoming probably the only person on the planet equally loved by twi-hards & Pottermaniacs. He’s already won the BAFTA & if the Academy opt to give the prize for a taditional orchestral score, then Desplat has it.

Who I give it to:- Need I say it? Of course A.R.Rahman for ‘127 hours’. Well, not just because of the pariotic fervour, but because I genuinely feel that that movie was really a difficult one to score considering most of the action takes place in silence & involves very little dialogue. Though I think Rahman has a sure shot chance to win for the ‘Original Song’ category, its tough to clinch this one. Any which way it’ll be a treat to see Rahman perform at the ceremony.

…and finally

9. BEST PICTURE

Who will win:- ‘The Social Network’. Yes the facebook fable is going to go home victorious that night. At least that’s what I believe. A well made film that got everyone’s attention regardless of whether they were facebookers or not. A coming out party for talented actors we’ve not seen much on screen but will definitely see a lot in the future. And a legendary director at the forefront to pull it all through. The Social Network was the movie to beat this year & so it will be at the Oscars.

Who might upset:- ‘The King’s Speech’. If there is any film that can spoil the fun for Fincher & co. then it is only Tom Hooper’s period drama. It has the momentum going for it, & in the last few months has been winning dollops of awards one after the other. It’s a close call that’s for sure. But I still think Zuckerberg will Poke King George out ;)

Who I give it to:- ‘Inception’. For all the reasons I mentioned above & also because it’s sad that despite making such a good film, the makers will unfortunately go back empty handed save for the technical awards. :(


So that was that, let's see how many I get right. For once I'm excited about a monday morning :)

And here is my personal list of the 10 best films of 2010


Sunday, December 26, 2010

Best films of 2010: a year end list

So it's the end of the year again & every Tom, Dick & Harry will be making a list of the best films of the year. And as much as I try not to be a 'Dick' I definitely fall into the category of the Tom's & Harry's of the world. So here's my list of the best/favourite films of the year 2010 :-

Although I'm yet to see some of the films that have been doing the rounds of the award nominations like the Oscar test tube baby 'The King's Speech', the indie gem 'The kids are alright' or auteur directed flicks like The Coen Brothers' 'True Grit', Danny Boyle's '127 hours', Clint Eastwood's 'Hereafter' or Roman Polanski's 'The Ghost Writer' I think I still have seen enough to muster up what I think are the 10 best (11 actually) of the year. So here goes...

10. The Other guys



This buddy cop comic caper starred Mark Wahlberg & Will Ferrell as detectives in a police dept. who get nothing more to do than warm the benches. Their big moment comes when detectives Danson & Highsmith (played by Dwayne Johnson & Samuel L. Jackson) "fall" victims to an accident (pun fully intended) & these two are called in to solve the mystery.

The other guys has some absolutely ROFL moments, the chemistry between Wahlberg & Ferrell is awesome & Jackson, Johnson & Keaton are comedy gold in their cameos. Throw in some pretty cool action sequences & a hot as hell Eva Mendes & you have a sparkling movie.

9. Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows part I


Ok, yes this was just one half of the puzzle with part 2 coming to our shores in July next year, but what impressed me the most about this Potter installment was that for the first time it screamed out unapologetically that it was meant for the hardcore Pottermaniacs. Only people who know the characters & situations inside out would be able to 'get' the movie.

Gone are the sun-kissed quidditch pitches of the 1st 2 films, gone is the slight buffoonery expected from the side characters & instead what we have is the darkest, eeriest, most intense Potter film we've seen. Focusing more on character introspection rather than huge epic sfx moments (though yes they are very much present, the 'Tale of the three brothers' sequence steals the show) Deathly hallows pt.1 satisfied the majority by striking the best book-to-film balance yet. The trio of Dan, Rupert & Emma stand up to the challenge & deliver triumphantly. Yes you miss the stalwarts (Rickman, Maggie Smith etc.) a bit but then there's part 2 coming up where all hell shall break loose. Amen.

8. Easy A


Emma Stone shines in this wonderfully bright teen/high school comedy of a girl who tells a tiny little lie in school, which then turns into a rumour which turns into an epic sized rumour & the next thing she knows is the whole school branding her a 'slut', 'tramp', 'harlot' & various other connotations of the same thing. Based loosely on Nathaniel Hawthorne's classic english novel The Scarlett Letter this Will Gluck directed film does much more than just modernize the novel's plot. It shows the perspective of this 17 year old girl who uses the school rumours to her advantage-yes they're talking bad about her, but at least they're talking about her, rather than being an invisible nobody at school that she previously was. In a weird off-kilter way she's "cool". Of course later on the rumour snowball grows far too large for her to control without the danger of being crushed herself. Not to worry all ends happily.

Patricia Clarkson, Stanley Tucci play the coolest parents I've ever seen in my life. And Lisa Kudrow & Amanda Bynes glow in their small roles. Easy A is an extremely witty, inventive, sweet coming-out party for Emma Stone.

7. For the number 7 spot we have a tie. I've picked 2 of the most awesome comic book to film adaptations I've seen.

(a). Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World


A pink-haired girl named Ramona, standing back to back with a man in a red t-shirt, Scott Pilgrim. Behind them pictures of her seven evil exes.

Hollywood has always struggled with making satisfactory & cool comic book adaptations & even more so with video game-to-movie adaptations (hitman, doom ugh!). Well fret no more because the perfect most scintillating, inventive, cool, & visually awe-inspiring comic book/video game movie is here.

Based on a series of graphic novels by Bryan Lee O’Malley, Scott Pilgrim is an indie rock/comic book/video game saga in which a young, Canadian bass player, while dating a teenage girl named Knives Chau, falls for Ramona Flowers, a cool American girl with funky hair, but discovers that in order to become her boyfriend, he will first have to vanquish her Seven Evil Exes in combat, each battle of which is presented in the style of a mid-1980s/early-1990s era console game. But wait a minute, Scott Pilgrim's story isn't based in this feeble real world of ours where jumping from tall building will result in broken limbs. No, this movie is based in hyper-reality where a high school bad boy can literally punch a hole into the moon, or Veganism can give people superpowers, or the loser of a fight will always explode into a pile of coins like they do in video games.

Scott pilgrim Vs. the world oozes every characteristic comic book/videogame cornerstone, so phone rings & fist punching are illustrated with text flowing across the scene- “RIIIIIIING!,” “POW!,” “KAZAAM!”, there are power-ups, one-ups, status bars for boss fights, cheesy electronic video game music & sounds to cut scenes.

Michael Cera is superb as Scott Pilgrim a role he was probably born to play. The set & character designs are breathtaking right from the way the characters look, to how they speak & move

Scott Pigrim Vs. the world totally kicks ass. Which brings us to our next movie...

(b). Kick Ass


In a 'normal' movie if an 11 year old girl pointed a gun to the camera & quipped with full aplomb "show's over motherf****ers" & then went on to pull the trigger you'd be extremely offended. Nope, not in this one. And that's pretty much Kick ass's audacity in a nutshell.

This 11 year old kid with bright pink hair is a hyper kinetic powerhouse named 'hitgirl' (Chloe Grace Moretz) who along with her father 'Big Daddy' (Nicolas cage) are caped crusaders who fight crime in gruesome ways you cannot imagine. Now they fight crime 'for real'. In another part of the city is a comic book loving nerdy teenager Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson) who puts on a patchy green coloured costume & 'aspires' to fight crime. He fancies himself to be called 'Kick ass'. Well, his plans of figting crime don't entirely go the way he plans but he doesn't give up.

Trouble occurs when Hit girl, Big daddy & Kick ass cross paths & all hell breaks loose.

Based on the graphic novel of the same name by Mark Millar & John Romita Jr. 'Kick Ass' was developed side by side as a movie along with the comic books, hence it works in close proximity with some scenes being exact reproductions of how they looked in the comic pages.

Kick ass is kinetic, colourful, aggressive, humorous & playful all at once & yes has a very healthy & heavy dose of violence & profanities. There were criticizms about showing a kid involved in the midst of this violence but come on, the film is too much fun & cool to be taken that seriously. In case they haven't noticed action comics/graphic novels aren't exactly about selling tea cups & playing with unicorns.

6. The Town


This gritty crime drama proves once & for all that Ben Affleck can totally nail it behind the camera. Based on the novel 'Prince of Thieves' written by Chuck Hogan The Town is set in Charlestown, Boston, an area which has bred the most number of bank robbers in the U.S & quite presumably so as we see in the movie that bank robbery is more of a family business in that part of the city. We follow Doug (Affleck), Jem (Renner), Gloansy (Slayne), & Dex (Burke) prowling the streets & robbing banks with intimidating masks, keeping up the family business.

That is until the emotions sizzle with Doug falling for Claire (Rebecca Hall), a bank manager his crew took hostage and then released. Jem, thinking Claire knows something, wants her dead. Doug wants her to live, & has hope for a future.

The Town is one of the most solid, potent cops & robbers gangster flick that I've seen in a while. The shoot-out & chase squences though filmy are still meticulously coreographed, especially the climax. The characters & situations are familiar, yet enticing & attention worthy. Acting performances are stingingly good all around, But The Hurt Locker's Jeremy Renner steals the show, & Mad Men's John Hamm totally aces it as the FBI agent.

5. Rabbit Hole


'Rabbit hole' is full of those hundreds of tiny instances in our day to day life which occur when we lose a loved one. Motherhood is most special to every woman, and so how does a woman cope when the motherhood is suddenly snatched away from her?

The film is about Becca and Howie- played by Nicole Kidman and Aaron Eckhart- a couple whose 4-year-old son ran out into the street in front of their handsome suburban house and was hit by a car 8 months ago resulting in the child's death, and how the parents are trying to restore a measure of normalcy to their lives, or the more preferred term-- "move on" with their lives.

Based on an acclaimed play by David Lindsay-Abaire, this John Cameron Mitchell directed film is heartbreaking yet hopeful, poignant yet humourous. In spite of the fact that the subject matter seems very grim & maudlin, the film is not. Instead it's sensitive & considerate. The humour in the film basically comes from the situations these characters are in, & their response to it. It's humour but not comedy.

Nicole Kidman delivers one of the best performances of her career, Aaron Eckhart is superb & Dianne Wiest shows a deft hand.

'Rabbit hole' is a conventionally made yet extremely well-acted film. Despite the fact that maybe not many of us have experienced death closely we can't help but nod in approval with the characters, because these characters are trying to get off a heavy load of burden from their shoulders & move on with their lives, & God knows all of us have our burdens we're trying to unload.

4. Shutter Island

Ben Kingsley and Leonardo DiCaprio

'Insanity' is the key word in Shutter Island. Very few films this year extracted as keen a level of involvement from me as this one did. It will make you question your principles, your psyche, your "reality". Martin Scorsese gives us a prison movie that's right up there with the likes of 'The Shawshank Redemption' & 'Green Mile'.

The prison in question here is the dreaded Ashecliffe asylum for the criminally insane (which believe me can give Gotham city's 'Arkham Asylum' a run for its money as far as the inmates go) located on Shutter island where US Marshal Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) & his partner Chuck (Mark Ruffalo) arrive to investigate the disappearance of a patient who supposedly vanished from a locked room. Sounds spooky? Well, that's just the beginning. As Teddy questions the other inmates & staff of the asylum under the supervision of the creepy & foreboding, yet suave & affable Dr. Cawley (excellently portrayed by a very un-Gandhian Ben Kingsley) things only get further convoluted & twisted. Also there's the torrential rain & heavy storm which makes it impossible for them to escape the island if need be.

It's extremely difficult to map out a plot summary for a film like this because everything seems to turn right on its head in the last 15 minutes.

What I like about Shutter Island is that it makes no qualms about what it's going to be- a straight up noir psychological thriller. And the ominous background score, dreary grey skies, drizzly weather & scraggy landscapes only help in getting the point home. DiCaprio gives one of his most inspired performances because unlike other characters that he's portrayed in Scorsese films like 'The Aviator' & 'Gangs of New York' Teddy Daniels doesn't have a set agenda or aspiration here, in fact quite the opposite, throughout the film we witness Daniels as a disturbed individual haunted by a horrific World war past & a lost wife. The flashback scenes are as ghastly as they are beautifully shot.

Shutter Island is at times a deeply unsettling & disturbing film but that's exactly how it was supposed to be. Some people called the film formulaic, but I don't see anything wrong with it as long as the formula is done to perfection note for note.

3. Toy Story 3

Toy Story 3

It's almost next to impossible that Pixar releases a film & one doesn't put it on a top 10 list of the year, but let's just step back for a minute & see the scale of what we're talking about. This is Toy Story for heaven's sake. One generation of kids had Snow white & Pinocchio, another had Peter Pan & Cinderella, yet another had Luke Skywalker & E.T. Well, my generation of kids had Woody & Buzz Lightyear. They're a part of the perfectly & heartily etched collage of childhood memories in our minds. And we don't want it to be disturbed even to the slightest. So when Disney announced that after 11 years they were coming out with a third installment of Toy Story I had mixed feelings, "will they ruin that perfect childhood portrait by making a substandard or (gulp!) mediocre movie?" But then as I sat there in the movie hall watching these visuals pass by in front of my eyes I realized that director Lee Unkrich is giving us kids of the 90's a much needed closure.

Toy Story 3 was a joy to behold this year like no other, it hit all the right buttons & took us through a whirlwind of emotions- from laughter & adventure to tears & heartbreak.

Our beloved toy characters Woody, Buzz, Jessie, Hamm, Rex, Barbie & the Potatoheads are in a crisis. Their "human" Andy has outgrown his playing age & is off to college. He plans to put his toys in the attic but they mistakenly end up in a box of toys to be donated to the Sunnyside daycare centre. Upon reaching the centre Andy's toys meet new toys, Barbie even gets to hook up with Ken! & all is hunky-dory till they meet Lotso the plush 'hug me' bear with cruel ulterior motives. This teddy bear is pretty easily the most sinister villain I saw on screen this year :)

The epic sized adventure of the toys is punched at regular intervals with dollops of fun & humour. The part where Buzz gets his language button switched to spanish is the funniest in the movie

And then it all culminates to that climatic scene where Andy is finally giving away his toys to a cute as a button shy little girl named Bonnie. This is when the fiercest of stone hearts will start to bawl like babies. There's no embarrassment in those brimming tears though. It's one of the most moving climaxes you'll see. Pixar did it last year with the sequence of Carl Fredrickson looking at his late wife's photo album in 'UP', & they do it again here. It's heartbreaking but its the perfect ending.

It makes us realize that these characters are much more than just cartoons, they belong to "infinity & beyond"

2. Inception

Inception

It came, we saw, & it freakin' conquered.

Do I need to sketch out a plot summary? You all saw it, you all raved about it, you all spend hours trying to figure out what exactly that ambiguous ending meant, one particular website went as far as measuring the tilt of Dom Cobb's top in the last scene to decide if it had tilted enough to fall or keep spinning. It was the most discussed movie on the internet of 2010. It gave a shot in the arm to psychology classes around the world because people want to know more about lucid dreaming & dream reading. What more do I say?

For once people didn't give a damn for their cell phone interjections, you pretty much slapped the guy next to you if he tried to make conversation, you came out of the cinema hall & you thought, you went home & you thought some more, you went to bed & thought about it further, & then the next morning when you woke up you weren't sure if you were actually awake or still dreaming! :)

I have raved & ranted in detail about Inception & other Christopher Nolan films here, so in this particular entry I'd just like to add a few more points.

As a film about architecture & architectural procedures, Inception is visually stunning, even if you keep the visionary plot & fantastic screenplay aside, Inception is just a fabulous movie to look at. Whether it's the eerily silent beautiful beach on which Dom Cobb wakes up on in the beginning, Saito's lair which looks like a cross between a chinese restaurant & a mafia conference room, the fantastic skyscrapers & city landscapes or the snow capped mountains or the plush hotel lobbies, or a bustling market place in Mombassa. The visuals are stunning & mark a clear line of demarcation of one dream sequence from the other which was so very essential in the last half hour of the film.

Hans Zimmer is first-rate with his musical score whether it's the haunting piano melody during Cobb & Mal's flashbacks, frantic African drum rythms during the Mombassa chase sequence or the loud, full blown, imposing orchestral powerhouse during the last 30 odd minutes of the film which more than aides in building up the tension.

There are those who criricize Nolan's films for being too mechanical & lacking the emotional quotient. Well I beg to differ, I think Cobb's agitations with his & his wife's past are what is at the crux of the film

It's one thing to make a great film, & quite another to make 2 great films back-to-back in a very short span of time. After giving us the superb & groundbreaking 'The Dark Knight' in 2008 Christopher Nolan found some further ground to break with this meticulous mind bender in just the next 2 years. Inception came with gargantuan expectations on it's back & still left us breathless. Now that's something.




And the no.1 spot goes to...





Drumroll...






1. The Social Network

The Social Network

12.jpg

Yup, no prizes for guessing this one. 'The Social Network' surpasses all other movies this year as far as impact, craft & characterization goes. I have seen it 6 times & can sit down for 6 more viewings without the slightest of hesitations.

So is this the story of how Mark Zuckerberg founded facebook? Well, yes. But it isn't just about the finding of facebook. Facebook is used almost as a metaphor to hold up a mirror to the way we live in today's world. How we are willing to fore go human contact & comfortably become slaves to technology. How unlike the good old days where working hard brought you benefits its working smart that reaps the benefits in today's day & age.

I don't know why Zuckerberg had a problem with him being portrayed the way he is in this movie, because quite frankly if anything, he seems way more cooler than he probably is thanks to this film! He is played to potent perfection by Jesse Eisenberg, & this movie's Mark doesn't seem to be driven by the greed & lust for power of the millions that he will eventually earn but as someone who is driven by an obsession with an abstract system, who finds satisfaction in manipulating systems, a genius who is a social outcast. Those types often go on to change the world.

Andrew Garfield's performance of Eduardo Saverin raises the emotional stakes of the film & he is the only one who comes across as the "good guy" in the movie. Justin Timberlake is terrific as Sean Parker the founder of music file sharing website Napster (see the irony of how a musician is made to play a music pirate?), Armie Hammer shines as Cameron & Tyler Winklevoss (yes he played both the parts).

The Soundtrack by Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross is eclectic & literally pumps life into the story. Sample a scene in which the Winklevoss' are competing in a rowing boat competition with a hyper kinetic 'electronified' version of "In the hall of the mountain king" playing in the background. Pure genius.

The Social Network doesn't come across as some boring step-by-step procedural of setting up a company, instead it plays out as a fast paced thriller, keeping you at the edge of your seat. The dialogue is sharp enough to rival a Tarantino flick, & the screenwriting stupendous. Credit for that goes to Aaron Sorkin who does his most ballsy work here.

David Fincher defined a generation's frustrations with his gritty action drama 'Fight Club' in 1999 & 11 years later he does it yet again with 'The Social Network'. Just like Sean Parker says in the movie "this is once-in-a-generation holy shit idea", The Social Network is a once-in-a-generation holy shit movie.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Runners up:-

These didn't make the top 10, but were still very good. Definitely deserve a dekko...

Green Zone:- Matt Damon stars in what can best be described as a Bourne movie set in Iraq.

Date Night:- Tina Fey, Steve Carrell. Need I say more?

Despicable Me:- A fun filled animation film where a supervillain is caught in a dilemma of destroying the world & playing daddy to 3 cute little girls. The minions are the epitome of awesomeness.

Tron: Legacy:- Every guy's cult favourite 1982 video game flick finally gets a sleek & glossy makeover. The story still sucks, but the orgasmic visuals more than make up for it, the soundtrack by Daft Punk is a winner & did I mention a super hot Olivia Wilde?

Iron Man 2:- Robert Downey Jr. puts on the metallic red suit once again to kick some Russian Mickey Rourke ass!
.
.
.
.
.

The Worst:-

Where there's good, the bad is bound to follow. Below are 5 films that came with tons of expectations but eventually turned out to be epic sized duds...

Due Date:- Todd Phillips' follow up to the rib tickling 'The Hangover' wasn't half as funny. Even the superb Robert Downey Jr. had nothing more to do than be a spectator to Zach Galifianakis's odd screwball act. Agreed it's a little harsh to call it a bad film. but it sure was a disappointing one. Gimme the air-drumming Mike Tyson over the masturbating dog any day.

Robin Hood:- It's quite ironic that in a year in which the Oscar winning team of Sir Ridley Scott & Aussie bad boy Russel Crowe re-teamed to make a film called 'Robin Hood', I still preferred Salman Khan's 'Robin Hood Pandey'.

Salt:- We've enjoyed Angelina Jolie kick butt before but this time round it was just plain uninteresting & stupid. Not only does this one lack salt but also every other spice required to make a film tasty.

Clash of the Titans:- 3D or no 3D 'Clash' sucked in every dimension. The special effects were patchy & I've probably seen school plays with better dialogue. Sorry Sam Worthington you don't look half as cool in 3D if James Cameron isn't directing you.

The Last Airbender:- Why Shyamalan Why? This is probably the film they screen in hell to make you pay for your sins. That's all I can say about it.


Monday, July 26, 2010

Respect Christopher Nolan because Christopher Nolan respects you.


Right at the beginning of Christopher Nolan's 2006 mystery film 'The Prestige' we see an assortment of magician hats lying on the ground followed by Christian Bale's voice over asking us "Are you watching closely?". Then the screen goes blank & the story unfolds. This voice over should probably be played before each & every Chris Nolan film, for in his films if you take your eyes off the screen for 3 seconds, you'll spend the next 3 minutes wondering what the hell is going on? His latest film Inception is no different. The master filmmaker who gave us the mind bending 'Memento' decides to bend our minds a little further this time by presenting us a cinematic Rubik's cube.

Inception brought about a hail storm among movie watchers around the globe rarely seen in today's time (well...previously seen at the end of last year actually when James Cameron made a film about blue aliens), making fanboys, film enthusiasts & social networks go into a tizzy, making words like 'totem' & 'limbo' a part of everyday terminology. A facebook page called 'team topples' was set up hours after the film hit theatres for people who beleive Cobb's totem eventually toppled (owing to the now famous ambiguous last sequence of the film), & I am positive another one negating it must surely be there too. Discussions ranged from "Why did Ariadne (Ellen Page's perspicacious character) share her name with a greek goddess", to "Was it raining in the 1st Fischer dream sequence because (Dileep Rao's character) Yusuf's bladder was full?", to an analysis of scenes in which DiCaprio's character is wearing a wedding band. And yet I am still to find a guy who has unraveled 100% of the film. But everybody was enchanted right down to the bone.






And all this was possible thanks to the ambitious no-holds-barred approach of director Christopher Nolan. Imagine pitching the idea to someone in theory. It sounds bizarre :-

Nolan :- A film where a man extracts memories otherwise inaccessible by invading the person's dream but that's not what our film's about, in our film he does the opposite, "Inception" instead of "Extraction"

Warner Bros. studio executive :- IN-whatnow? anyways how does he do it?

Nolan:- he puts together a team of intelligent individuals who speak excellent scientific boohaki, go into the subjects dream, within a dream, within a dream,within a dream, within...er...no...then into a limbo, then back again racing against time. Oh & this central character's got marital problems, his gorgeous-as-hell dead wife keeps showing up & ruining stuff for him & his team, & then we show equally confusing flashbacks to determine why exactly the wife died...or did she?? & then we give an ending that's actually not an ending. You followin' me?? Hey chief??

(Fortunately Nolan took this Warner Bros. exec's shell shocked blank eyed expression as a 'Yes' & went ahead with the project)





Jokes apart though, the single most crucial quality that sets Nolan apart from his contemporaries is that he trusts the audience, the movie goer, us. His most characteristic quality is the use of a non-linear story telling method where scenes are shown out of chronological order. He scatters the jigsaw puzzle pieces in front of us & then challenges us to put them together. But it gets better- in some cases, the picture that finally comes up after putting all the pieces together maybe different for each movie goer. Such is the brilliance of the man who might be one of the most important film directors of the past decade.

The first Nolan film i saw was 'Batman begins', previous Batman film adaptations included 2 Tim Burton blockbusters that were more style over substance, & 2 Joel Schumacher films that seemed more like Batman spoofs than actual Batman films. One wondered what different approach would this British filmmaker bring to the much loved caped crusader of Gotham city? But Nolan defied all odds by giving us style and substance in a tremendous amalgamation & delivering a Batman movie that was many notches above its predecessors.

In a 2 hour film called BATMAN begins, the first real glimpse we see of Batman in a complete batsuit is around the 1hr 1 min mark. Nolan trusts the audience to sit through the 1st hour of the movie, making us familiar first with Bruce Wayne, his motivations, constraints & compulsions before unleashing an all out bat-fest.



Another fine example of Nolan's skill, finesse & entrusting the audience is of course the cult 2000 hit 'Memento'. Here he dealt with a central character Leonard who suffers from anterograde amnesia or short term memory loss, & using his intense system of notes, Polaroid photos, & tattoos is out to track down his wife's killer, or so he thinks. Nolan adapted a prodigious screenplay which went in the reverse order therein making the viewer as unaware, clueless & confused as Leonard, pertaining to what events took place prior to what they were witnessing.



The 2002 film 'Insomnia' which followed Memento took a slightly different turn. Starring Al Pacino & Robin Williams it dealt with LAPD detective Will Dormer who is sent up to Alaska (where it is daytime 24 hours) to solve the rape & murder of a teenage girl. Now, instead of making the film a typical whodunnit (which it seems for most of the 1st half) Nolan brings a twist wherein we identify the culprit halfway through. The film then becomes an intense tale of guilt, dark secrets, penitence & to some extent even redemption. The photography makes the weather into a character too, setting the somber mood of the film.


2006's 'The Prestige' starring Hugh Jackman & Christian Bale in lead roles, set in the London of the late 1800's is a tale of two rival magician's who are in a constant battle of one-upmanship owing to a freak accident that took the life of one of the magician's wife. Both are obsessed with finding the 'ultimate magic trick', and yes they do discover this ultimate magic trick. What it is, how it works & most importantly how it changes the outcome of the story is what the rest of the film is about. All through the film the audience is kept guessing which of the two rivals will have the last laugh, until the final twist is revealed. (Personally though i thought that the build up to the suspense was better than the final 'reveal', but that's just my opinion)




And what do I say about 'The Dark Knight' that hasn't already been said? Simply put it's the best super hero film ever, in fact one of the best films ever. Period. That's what made Nolan a household name. That's what gave kids nightmares about the Joker. How did Nolan trust the audience here? He made us line up to watch a sequel, ensuring that a 2nd movie will mean twice the fun. He brought us the dark, gothic feel of the comic books, the intensity of the animated series & the stunt set pieces of an all out actioner.



But I was most enchanted by Nolan's very first film, the 1998 neo-noir low-budget british film 'Following' about how a young man's obsession with following people leads him into a dark underworld. Despite being a short, with a running time of just 64 minutes, it's as mind boggling, mystifying, puzzling & baffling as 'Inception' or 'Memento'. Shot in stark black & white, it'll keep you at the edge of the seat until the final scene which will make you go 'F**K'!. These were the humble beginnings of what was to come. Interestingly, the film features a secondary character named "Cobb", which also happens to be the name of the main protagonist's character in 'Inception'. The Cobb of Following is a burglar, but he ain't no ordinary burglar, he breaks into people's houses & instead of stealing valuables goes for boxes with personal items of the individuals. So in theory both the Cobb's of Inception & Following are stealing memories. (: Another interesting fact in Following is- in one scene the house that Jeremy & Cobb decide to burgle has a Bat symbol on it's door.




In today's times where most of the big budget hollywood films are either remakes/rehashes (Karate Kid, The A-team) or blatant displays of CGI & special effects (Transformers, Harry Potter, Clash of the titans, Twilight & yes even Avatar) Nolan in a rare sight brings out unbelievable computer wizardry only when required. Hence, we are in awe in sequences like the one where Ariadne makes a Paris city street literally roll back on itself in Inception.

In Roger Ebert's review of Inception, he concludes it perfectly when he says- "I think when Nolan left the labyrinth, he threw away the map". Within 8 months of it's release every major hollywood studio has aped Avatar trying to advertise their films by bringing forth it's "Avatar-like" qualities- 3D, epic fantasy setting- even if they had none (Clash of the titans, Last Airbender), whereas i doubt if anyone can ape the phenomenal success of Inception that easily because the subject matter is intense, casting & performances pitch perfect, & direction & screenplay near flawless. It's not everybody's cup of tea to turn the viewer of a film into a participant, & keep you on your toes. The day I figure out exactly why Saito is an old man, & Dom Cobb a young man in the opening scenes of Inception, I will pump my fist in the air & shout 'Eureka!'. Now how many other films give you that opportunity?


.
.
.

I came across this interesting piece where 6, yes that's right 6 interpretations of the film have been presented.

Actor Dileep Rao from the film answers some FAQ's about Inception.

Another nice article about Inception & Christopher Nolan.